The ads above are Google-sponsored, ......just clicking on them and looking at them helps support this website!


BMW Motorcycles (and applicable to many others):

Steering Dampers
Including a basic discussion of shock absorbers and springs in general.

© Copyright, 2012, R. Fleischer

article 54, section8A    
section8stdampers.htm
 

First....a basic discussion of shock absorbers:

Shock absorbers do a number of things, including what the name implies,  'absorbing shock' (bump) energy.  In almost all motorcycles, the shock
absorber is both hydraulic and air operated, and is almost always combined with the suspension spring.   The energy captured by the spring in any
one direction is moderated by the shock absorber, otherwise the spring would allow the parts of the suspension called 'unsprung weight' to 'pogo'
...or oscillate up and down...and the more the oscillation, the less time the tire is on the ground.   Shock absorbers are often designed such that their
effect in one direction is vastly different than in the other direction; and some shocks are adjustable for it, in one or both directions.     Various names
are given to these two directions and effects, but often 'bound' and 'rebound' are used.   The common shock absorber and spring units made by Koni (now IKON)
and installed at the rear of the twin-shock Airheads, most of which use the 7610-1298 model, have an adjustment at the spring perch for ride height (as you
increase the loading, use a higher setting; and may have an adjustment via a black toothed wheel under the rubber cup at the top, it is an adjustment for REBOUND.
Some types of Ikon and Koni shocks do not have that wheel, but are adjustable by rotating the upper part, and some models have NO adjustment.

Besides absorbing spring energy; shock units, properly designed and set-up, will greatly help keep the wheel in contact with the ground for longer
periods of time, particularly during quite bumpy roads; and most particularly, at least to the typical rider, during bumpy downhill turns.      Generally,
better-quality shocks are quite good at this.   The best shock units, which are usually very expensive, will give better control over bumps and other
road irregularities ...no matter the size or frequency of such, and will not 'fade' or change characteristics very much, as the absorbed energy is
converted to heat.  

As a somewhat general rule, cheap shock absorbers have characteristics that may be adequate but are not the best, and ride quality and handling may suffer...sometimes quite substantially.   Except on very high-end motorcycles, the factory shock units are generally a compromise between cost, performance, and average rider acceptability.

Although the front fork suspension shock/spring unit and the rear shock spring unit may look totally different, they both have to do a similar job, and the performance of one will affect the other.
 
Some steering dampers are hydraulic/oil operated and sophisticated.
 
There are various types of 'dampers'....and just the word 'damper' has somewhat different meaning in various
Countries....typically though the difference is between suspension shock absorbers and steering shock absorbers;
where 'damper' is more often used with steering (some use 'dampener').

 

STEERING DAMPERS (also called Dampeners):

Some have used them to mask out some of the effects from other problems...such as excessively loose wheel bearings and steering head bearings.    Some few still seem to think that they are 'the answer' to supposed tendencies of bikes to have tank slapper's.  Airheads with properly set up bearings don't have those problems.

The /5-SWB models CAN have problems with FORK mounted windshields, and the dampener CAN help with that.   In fact, any airhead with large fork-mounted windshields can have instabilities.  The R65 with the short wheelbase is much less susceptible.

Bikes can get increasingly close to instability with rear trunks, side luggage, backrests, rear weight.....etc.....and in some instances the use of a bit of dampener can allow 'more comfortable' higher speed cruising, than without the dampener.   There are obvious limits to the 'help' though!....and that limit might well be very suddenly thrust upon you.

Use of steering dampeners/dampers always makes steering effort a bit...or more than a bit... higher.   They can, whether friction disc or hydraulic-type, do a good job at masking certain types of road irregularities.  They were often used by folks that had mostly unfounded fears of loosing control of their bikes on the popular rain-grooves being increasingly added some years ago to paved (especially concrete) freeways.    This is PARTICULARLY so with the straight-ribbed tires....those old RB series Continental's, as a prime example. Straight-ribbed tires are still made, .....most follow rain-grooves....and when the rain-grooves were made by tipsy-road workers, they are ...well....they can wake you up from your 'only one cuppa'  your morning commute.

They can be of help in very soft off-road work.  Quite nice on irregular cobblestones, rocky surfaces, and so on....and in any situation where some really large irregularity might try to, seemingly, not necessarily!... wrench the bars out of your grip.

On many sidecar rigs, the use of a dampener is a necessity, some rigs are uncontrollable in the range of 10-25 mph, without a dampener.    When I install a damper on a sidecar rig, I make sure the wheel bearings and steering head bearings are properly set up FIRST.   Since the type of front tire has an effect, that is taken into consideration too (the flatter the tread, the wider that flat tread, the LESS dampening needed). 

In general, a hydraulic dampener is more effective than a friction type, but at a somewhat greater increase in steering force, than a friction dampener.....some major portion of the reason is in the mathematics of the velocity increase of the parts, and the STICTION required to be overcome (OK...everyone happy, I did not put any math formulas here?).  SOMEtimes the reverse is true, however!   However, because sidecarists use very large bars-inputs, some prefer friction dampeners, but not all prefer them over hydraulic types.  In many instances it is possible to install a hydraulic dampener in a way that makes its STROKE adjustable.  This is a nice improvement, in that you can use the minimum amount of stroke that works OK, without adding the need for too much steering effort.  In the case of the stock friction dampers on some motorcycles, they are sometimes not effective enough for sidecar use, and many times one can modify it with perhaps another steel plate and one more friction pad, and thereby come close to doubling its effectivness.

Unless your bike has a sidecar attached, or reduced trail for some other reason, or you have a front fork mounted windshield or fairing.....or have a big dislike for the 'feel' of the bike on soft or very irregular surfaces,  or insist on a ribbed front tire but dislike rain grooves...I would see no real reason for a dampener.

The use of steering dampers has a real drawback, besides what has been mentioned above.  They WILL reduce the 're-centering' forces, thereby making you work harder to steer your bike.  This is true for 2-wheelers as well as sidecar rigs.  I have seen sidecar rigs in which the steering was just plain UGLY, due to the wrong use of dampeners.   AND, it is FAR FAR better to properly adjust the steering head bearings, and NOT use, or hardly, any steering damper, whether it is a friction or hydraulic type, and this is for 2 wheel bikes and 3 wheel sidecar rigs and trikes.

 

For a pdf file on the Ikon-Koni-springs, click this line

rev:
11/23/2004:  clarity
04/08/2009:  Add section at top on shocks in general
01/23/2010:  clarify and add more on damper effects
05/12/2012:  Add link to the springs pdf, inadvertently left out previously.

© Copyright, 2012, R.Fleischer

Return to Technical Articles LIST Page

Back to the HomePage