Federal Law authorizing modulators.
California & other States.
How pulsing light affects humans.
((ALSO see Part 6 of: http://bmwmotorcycletech.info/lamps.htm))
© Copyright, 2012, R. Fleischer
Headlight modulators are controversial. Several viewpoints/arguments.
Some find modulators annoying (I believe that is usually, perhaps not always,
folks seeing OTHER folks' modulators, not their own...?). Some are concerned
about oncoming drivers FIXATING on one's modulating headlight & thereby, somehow,
aiming for them, this seems to mostly come from the idea that a motorcyclist tends to
ride to wherever they fixate on. Whether or not to install a headlight modulator on YOUR
bike, is a personal choice, obviously. My comments in this article apply to the USA, as
headlight modulators may not be legal in some other Countries.
There ARE reasons that motorcycles are specified, since 1978 in California, & specified in
many other States, to automatically, upon ignition turn-on, have their headlights ON, without
having to separately turn the headlight(s) on. State law & Federal law are not necessarily the
same thing, but typically, Federal law supersedes. There is also an argument about certain
cars, such as late models, having constant-on headlights...the argument usually is something
on the order of motorcyclists want themselves to have such lights, to differentiate between
them and cars. That's a decent argument, to my way of thinking.
A lot of safety agencies, & studies, have proven that safety is enhanced for motorcyclists
having modulated headlights (& bright clothing, & certain colors of helmets, etc)....as it attracts
attention, particularly important to a motorcyclist, who wants, or should want, an oncoming
driver to notice/recognize that a motorcycle IS there. This has been shown to reduce left-turn
accidents, & in general, reduce most biking accidents. I have been conducting experiments
with reflective stripes on my sidecar rig, & have put an article on this subject on this website.
California had a law, early-on, about allowing modulators. NOW, all States must conform to the
Federal Law allowing modulators FOR MOTORCYCLISTS. I suppose an argument could be
made that such 'allowing' applies to only roads that had Federal money paying for all or some
of those roads, but I have not dug into that, it being, in my opinion, rather a moot point.
The major point is that a properly installed & operating modulated headlight is legally allowed,
everyplace, in the USA, for all practical purposes.
It is also true, that no manufacturer that I know of supplies modulating headlights as standard,
but this is a relatively moot point, since the manufacturer would want the rider/owner to have
the choice. My understanding is that there IS a long term study underway NOW, about safety
increases with motorcyclists and modulators. If this results in modulators reducing accidents,
or otherwise are beneficial, we MIGHT end up with a Federal Rule/Regulation/Law, that all new
motorcycles must have daytime modulating headlights (probably meeting the specifications
shown later in the article you are reading.
Studies have shown that adding lights at the rear (& in some instances the sides) of motorcycles
makes them more visible (and earlier recognized!). For the rear, the lights should be red & as
differentiated as possible between run & brake. Bright clothing, greenish-yellowish helmets, etc.
...all reduce accidents. I see no one arguing about 'fixating' on THEM.
The article, below, concerns itself with HEADLIGHTS, but a lot of the same science applies to
lights in general.
The human eye and brain; how light bursts & modulated light affects us:
particularly to color & light bursts, are relatively unique. Simplified, here are some things to know.
Since you likely already 'know'; or should, that a headlight modulator causes 'attention-grabbing' by
other humans, & I WANT you to READ this...I will put the section on bursts, first:
It has been known for a very long time that human's eye/brain responses to light bursts are peculiar. Some of
today's knowledge about this subject was known by such as Augustin Fresnel, who invented the Fresnel Lens
(which, when rotated, was used in seaside lighthouses up until perhaps the mid-20th century). Fresnel found
that using a lot of prisms in such a position as to result in a collimated radial light beam, would produce a beam
of light that could be seen by mariners at a great distance. Lighthouses had been in use for a very long time,
long before there were electric powered lamps.
UNfortunately, Fresnel did NOT know about the Broca-Sulzer Effect.
Broca & Sulzer determined that short pulses of light of a CERTAIN DURATION will appear BRIGHTER than if
the pulses lasted longer in time (or, for that matter, continuously!). There is much more to Broca-Sulzer, but
here is what is important, on a practical basis, assuming a quite modest or brighter light source:
If the light duration is over 0.150 second, the light burst only marginally appears brighter than a continuous light.
The effect is more if the light is quite bright. BUT...if the light duration is around 0.044 second, a light of
maybe 150 to a few hundred Lux, will appear VERY much brighter than a continuous light.
I will guess here that some of you will immediately think: "Well, bright light causes the eye's pupil to contract
to protect the eye, so a short burst will not last long enough for the pupil to change size". You'd be only partially
correct. If you think about it, & the above paragraph, the statement seems reversed....that is, the
0.150 second duration is only marginally brighter-appearing, than a SHORTER duration effect,
Broca & Sulzer's work was published in 1902. Similar work was done by Blondel & Rey in 1911.
The bottom-line here is that if you want a light to attract attention, without having it monstrously bright, one method
is to have the light come in short bursts, lasting on the order of 0.030 second to maybe 0.200 second. Thus, a
headlight with a short burst of light, will be more visible to others, than one running continuously yet of
considerably higher power!!!
Think about that. On a practical basis, when you WANT your headlight to be visible by oncoming traffic,
perhaps so they do not turn left in front of you, you can use a modulated headlight beam of the 'correct'
characteristics, and it will be MORE attention-getting than a rather
substantially more powerful headlight.
This is NOT the only strange effect of light on humans (besides resetting our Circadian clocks, particularly
BLUE light, etc.).
If the light is in continuous pulses of a certain width (time) & within a certain narrow range of pulse RATES,
it will 'attract' even more attention by the human brain. Some ascribe this sensitivity to such as the brain's
alpha rhythms....but this is only one explanation of several. There are some very scholarly articles regarding
our ancestors & danger, & how the brain & eyesight & hearing evolved, etc. Won't get into it here.
The Federal Law that allows headlight modulators on motorcycles is a mixture of mostly science & some practicality
....in that INCANDESCENT headlight lamps (this includes Halogen's like the H4) can NOT physically have their
ACTUAL LIGHT OUTPUT decrease to anywhere's near zero at the modulating RATE that is best to attract attention
by the human brain. This is due to the hot filament being unable to cool fast enough during the OFF period, & heat up
fast enough for the ON period. Thus, the Federal requirements are a compromise, although a reasonably good one.
For a fuller explanation, yet not complicated to understand, read the Federal Law, below.
HID: HID headlights are already fairly common. They don't turn on & off to full output instantaneously. They are
efficient, however, & if properly focused & shaped, the beams can be very good for bikers. UNfortunately, the simple
bulb change KITS on the market are big compromises. HID lights are much more difficult to modulate, due to arc
re-establishment. My guess is that we won't see HID headlights being modulated on motorcycles without some
sort of new developments.
LED: By mid-2012 we were already seeing some cars with LED headlights appearing in the highest priced cars.
LED lights can be turned on & off just about instantaneously. Thus, an LED modulated headlight, with a PROPERLY
DESIGNED modulator (& reflector/lens) might well be PERFECT for bikers. I have experimented with some
modulators & LED lamps, & find that all the modulators worked wonderfully with the LED lamps, better than Halogen
H4 lamps. LED lamps are used in most cars now, trucks too, for the rear lights, some in the headlights, some only
on one beam, but the LED headlights are very probably going to be THE universal STANDARD, SOON.
The way the Federal Law is written, I believe that modulated LED headlights will comply with the Law, as written, IF
they comply with this: "The lowest intensity at any test point shall be not less than 17 percent of the maximum
intensity measured at the same point". On a practical basis it matters little, if that is complied with ...or not. The
headlight could be fully turned off for its lowest intensity, as a practicality.
What will happen is that the LED modulators will be built to do this...or, the law will be changed...or both, or the
modulators that do not comply will simply get away with not complying, as no one will much care. Section (f) of
the regulations will be changed or assumed to mean that it is only for incandescent lamps.
Some preliminary tests have been done on this effect, using various 'colors' of LED light. They show an increased
Side note: Since 1979, most motorcycles sold...but not all... have had a headlight ON function when the ignition
is on. This was done by most manufacturer's due to some States having laws that said that the headlight must
be on. It has been relatively popular, usually for reasons of saving alternator watts, for owners to modify their
motorcycles....to add the Euro type switches which allow the headlight to be controlled.
To the best of my knowledge Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards do not 'require' daytime-on headlamps for
motorcycles. Reference: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2004/octqtr/49cfr571.108.htm This is the Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 108, usually just shown as FMVSS 108. This long hard-to-read article has a chart
section, well-buried, that is JUST for MOTORCYCLES. In this chart the Federal Government has SPECIFIED
maximum brightness of your headlight, in Candelas. I mention this, as many of you have installed over-size
headlights. Of course, few are ever stopped by the police for such.
NOTE that in Canada, there is also a similar document, but it is referred to as CMVSS 108, and it DOES require
daytime lamps-on, from 1/1/90 (If I remember correctly).
Some States do require daytime running headlamps, & new production, from 1/1/90, at least was encouraged.
Federally, motorcycle manufacturers began equipping all motorcycles built for sale in the U.S. with them.
Here's another website describing current federal regulations, regarding motorcycle lighting, including headlamp
WAIS Document Retrieval [Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 49, Volume 5]
[Revised as of October 1, 2001]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
CHAPTER V--NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF
PART 571--FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS--Table of Contents
Subpart B--Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
Sec. 571.108 Standard No. 108; Lamps, reflective devices, and associated
S7.9.4 Motorcycle headlamp modulation system.
S22.214.171.124 A headlamp on a motorcycle may be wired to modulate either the upper
beam or the lower beam from its maximum intensity to a lesser intensity,
(a) The rate of modulation shall be 240 <plus-minus> 40 cycles per minute.
(b) The headlamp shall be operated at maximum power for 50 to 70 percent of
(c) The lowest intensity at any test point shall be not less than 17 percent of the
maximum intensity measured at the same point.
(d) The modulator switch shall be wired in the power lead of the beam filament
being modulated and not in the ground side of the circuit.
(e) Means shall be provided so that both the lower beam and upper beam
remain operable in the event of a modulator failure.
(f) The system shall include a sensor mounted with the axis of its sensing
element perpendicular to a horizontal plane. Headlamp modulation shall cease
whenever the level of light emitted by a tungsten filament light operating at
3000 deg. Kelvin is either less than 270 lux (25 foot-candles) of direct light
for upward pointing sensors or less than 60 lux (5.6 foot-candles) of reflected
light for downward pointing sensors. The light is measured by a silicon cell
type light meter that is located at the sensor and pointing in the same
direction as the sensor. A Kodak Gray Card (Kodak R-27) is placed at ground
level to simulate the road surface in testing downward pointing sensors.
(g) When tested in accordance with the test profile shown in Figure 9, the
voltage drop across the modulator when the lamp is on at all test conditions
for 12 volt systems and 6 volt systems shall not be greater than .45 volt. The
modulator shall meet all the provisions of the standard after completion of the
test profile shown in Figure 9.
(h) Means shall be provided so that both the lower and upper beam function
at design voltage when the headlamp control switch is in either the lower or
upper beam position when the modulator is off.
(a) Each motorcycle headlamp modulator not intended as original equipment, or
its container, shall be labeled with the maximum wattage, and the minimum
wattage appropriate for its use. Additionally, each such modulator shall
comply with S126.96.36.199 (a) through (g) when connected to a headlamp of the
maximum rated power & a headlamp of the minimum rated power, & shall
provide means so that the modulated beam functions at design voltage when
the modulator is off.
(b) Instructions, with a diagram, shall be provided for mounting the light sensor
sensor including location on the motorcycle, distance above the road surface,
and orientation with respect to the light.
Here is an easy to read page on NHTSA use of modulators, lighting, etc:
Laws for various states for most everything concerned with motorcycles:
Link is for Calfornia, but you can select any State:
California law is brief. Federal Law will supersede California law on Federal Highways, and on
highways/roads that were paid for in part or wholly by federal funds. I believe that Federal Law
will supersede any State's Law, on a practical basis, if not an absolute basis, on any road in the
State, that has had Federal money involved, or not. Knowing the broad brush law in YOUR home
State may be of some help, if ever a question on modulators. You can check YOUR State's laws,
but I will bet that any Court will hold that the Federal law applies.
California Vehicle Code that specifies headlight-on is section 25650.5, & the section that
allows motorcycles to have modulators is 25251.2. It specifies that the UPPER beam is to
be modulated (note that Federal law allows either). California Law provides only that the
modulation is between a higher and a lower brightness, at a 200-280 rate, and not to be
used in darkness. This is basically like the federal law...except that California has NONE
of the fancy specifications from (a) onwards, as in the federal law, in (2), above.
OFFICIAL California Vehicle Code definition of DARKNESS is in section 280 of the California Vehicle
Code. Darkness is defined as 1/2 hour after sunset to 1/2 hour before sunrise; or at any other time
visibility is not sufficient to clearly....discern....any person or vehicle on the highway (yes, they do say
highway), at 1000 feet. They do NOT specify what sunrise, sunset and highway is in that section.
04/12/2010: Add California Vehicle Law information
05/22/2010: Add technical information on human eye sensitivity to light bursts and modulated light, and
clean up article somewhat.
10/08/2010: Split the Federal Law section into 2, and add (1)
06/08/2011: Clean up article
06/25/2011: Clear up...somewhat!....Federal and California Law
10/02/2012: Add QR code; add language button; update Google Ad-Sense code
2013: remove language button as its scripting code had problems with some browsers.
09/15/2014: Clean up for clarity.
01/29/2015: Rechecked. Add a bit on conspicuity, etc...clarifying some statements. a tad more in Sept. 2015.
12/10/2015: Update meta-codes, justify article to left, and clean it up considerably. NO technical changes at all.
03/05/2016: Final version of above.
©Copyright, 2012, R. Fleischer
Return to Technical Articles LIST Page
Return to HomePage
Last edit of THIS page: Tuesday, April 26, 2016